Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Business

Marco Rubio Has Questions for Commerce Department About Huawei Business Dealings With U.S. Companies

Share Story Via Text or E-Mail

Last week, U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., sent a letter to U.S. Commerce Sec. Wilbur Ross requesting information concerning Huawei’s orders of semiconductors from American companies.


Share Story Via Text or E-Mail
Share Story Via Text or E-Mail

Last week, U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., sent a letter to U.S. Commerce Sec. Wilbur Ross requesting information concerning Huawei’s orders of semiconductors from American companies.

The full text of the letter is below.

Dear Secretary Ross:

As you are well versed, due to its ties to the Chinese Communist Party, Huawei continues to pose a significant threat to the U.S. economy, national security, and our critical infrastructure. I strongly support the actions taken by the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) on August 17, 2020, which closed certain loopholes to the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) related to Huawei. These actions were meant to prevent U.S.-developed technology from being used to undermine our own national security.

It has been brought to my attention that Huawei is ordering semiconductors from certain U.S.-based chip companies, or through others stockpiling them, with the intent to ship them in the event that those companies are granted individual export licenses (IVLs), or if Huawei is removed from the Entity List. Accordingly, I respectfully request responses to the following questions:

      1. Since August 17, 2020, how many IVLs has BIS approved to U.S. semiconductor manufacturers for the purpose of export, re-export or transfer of any item subject to the EAR to Huawei?
      2. For each IVL, please explain your policy rationale for approval.
      3. Absent an IVL, would it be legal for a U.S. semiconductor company to stockpile items subject to the EAR for ultimate export, reexport or transfer to Huawei after September 14, 2020, or to receive compensation from Huawei for doing so?
      4. If so, what is the policy rationale for allowing such stockpiling?
      5. Does the Administration have any intent to remove Huawei from the Entity List?

For purposes of this inquiry, “Huawei” means Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd., Huawei Investment and Holding Co. Ltd., or any entity with more than 20 percent of the shares of which are ultimately owned by either of the aforementioned. I would appreciate responses to this before December 31, 2020.

Thank you for your attention to this important matter.

Author

  • Florida Daily

    Florida Daily offers news, insights and analysis as we cover the most important issues in the state, from education, to business and politics.

    View all posts

Share Story Via Text or E-Mail
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow our Facebook Page

Follow us on X, Insta, Linkedin
<

Related Stories

Florida Politics

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready... Share Story Via Text or E-MailIn response to former President Donald Trump being found guilty on all 34...

Immigration

Share Story Via Text or E-MailWith the 2024 Presidential Election less than six months away, a recent poll shows that most Americans (52%) prefer...

Senator Rick Scott

Share Story Via Text or E-MailFlorida Senator Rick Scott was joined by fellow Florida Republican Senator Marco Rubio and Alaska’s Senators Lisa Murkowski (R),...

Healthcare

Share Story Via Text or E-MailThe Veterans Affairs Community Care Program (VCCP) provides health care for veterans in need outside of VA facilities. A...